Seal of the State of Ohio. Click here to return to the Supreme Court home page. The Supreme Court of Ohio & The Ohio Judicial System. Click here to return to the Supreme Court home page. Line Drawing of the Ohio Judicial Center. Click here to return to the Supreme Court home page.
Spacer image

The Supreme Court of Ohio & The Ohio Judicial System

Opinion Search Filter Settings
Use standard search logic for the Opinion Text Search (full-text search). To search the entire web site click here
Opinion Text Search:   What is Opinion Text Search?
Search Truncation Warning:
Source:    What is a Source?
Year Decided From:
Year Decided To:    What is Year Decided?
Year Decided Range Warning:
County:    What is County?
Case Number:    What is Case Number?
Author:    What is Author?
Topics and Issues:    What are Topics and Issues?
WebCite No: -Ohio-    What is a Web Cite No.? WebCite and Citation are unique document searches. If a value is entered in the WebCite or Citation field, all other search filters are ignored. If values are entered in both the WebCite and Citation fields, only the WebCite search filter is applied.
Citation:    What is Citation?
This search returned 74 rows. Rows per page: 
12345678
Case CaptionCase No.Topics and IssuesAuthorCitation / CountyDecidedPostedWebCite
In re T.S. 18AP-270Appeal dismissed based on lack of standing.BrownFranklin 3/14/2019 3/14/2019 2019-Ohio-886
Taneff v. Lipka 18AP-291In an R.C. Chapter 2129 land sale action, appellants did not demonstrate the trial court erred in removing one of the appellants as ancillary administrator, failing to remove the successor ancillary administrator, confirming the land sale, approving attorney fees for the work of the successor ancillary administrator, or imposing attorney fees and costs as sanctions for violations of Civ.R. 11 and R.C. 2323.51. Judgment affirmed.SadlerFranklin 3/14/2019 3/14/2019 2019-Ohio-887
Dept. of Youth Servs. v. Grimsley 18AP-546The trial court did not err in its interpretation of DYS’s policies related to the use of force, and the trial court did not abuse its discretion in determining reliable, probative, and substantial evidence supports SPBR’s order.SchusterFranklin 3/14/2019 3/14/2019 2019-Ohio-888
Moore v. Dept. of Rehab. & Corr. 18AP-599Trial court did not err when it granted motion to dismiss.BrownFranklin 3/5/2019 3/5/2019 2019-Ohio-767
State v. Beasley 17AP-629Trial court did not commit plain error by not instructing the jury on the offense of physical control, which appellant asserted was a lesser included offense of operating a vehicle under the influence. Appellant's convictions were supported by sufficient evidence and were not against the manifest weight of the evidence. Appellant failed to demonstrate the trial court erred in denying the motion to suppress based on alleged inconsistencies between testimony at the suppression hearing and trial. Appellant failed to establish ineffective assistance of trial counsel related to the motion to suppress, motion for acquittal, failure to request jury instruction on lesser-included offense, failure to provide witness list prior to trial, voir dire, and the cumulative effect of the individual allegations of ineffective assistance of counsel.DorrianFranklin 2/28/2019 2/28/2019 2019-Ohio-719
State ex rel. Calhoun v. Indus. Comm. 17AP-820Mandamus denied; relator's refusal to subject himself to an examination by his employer's physician does not constitute good cause under R.C. 4123.65(C).KlattFranklin 2/28/2019 2/28/2019 2019-Ohio-720
State v. Zimmerman 18AP-75Where the evidence against the defendant was conflicting, and where jury foreperson admitted she viewed excluded prejudicial evidence and relayed what she saw to the other jurors at the outset of deliberations, and where officer witnesses offered hearsay testimony and improperly vouched for the credibility of the victim, defendant was deprived of a fair trial and the trial court abused its discretion when it denied defendant's motion for new trial.BrunnerFranklin 2/28/2019 2/28/2019 2019-Ohio-721
King v. King 18AP-84Trial court did not err when it granted wife's motion to liquidate spousal support arrearage.BrownFranklin 2/28/2019 2/28/2019 2019-Ohio-722
RiverPark Group, LLC. v. City of Dublin 18AP-188No abuse of discretion for denying Civ. R. 60(B) motion for relief from judgment and without an evidentiary hearing. Judgment of the trial court affirmed.BrunnerFranklin 2/28/2019 2/28/2019 2019-Ohio-723
O'Brien v. Dept. of Transp. 18AP-231Court of Claims magistrate's exclusion of expert testimony concerning how human factors affect standard of care and causation in accident alleged to be caused by ODOT road sign placement on state rural highway with multiple roads intersecting at a common point was prejudicial error. Cause reversed and remanded for new trial.BrunnerFranklin 2/28/2019 2/28/2019 2019-Ohio-724
12345678